web site hit counter Como se escreve a História/Foucault: Revoluciona a História - Ebooks PDF Online
Hot Best Seller

Como se escreve a História/Foucault: Revoluciona a História

Availability: Ready to download

Em 'Como se escreve a história' estão reunidos dois dos melhores ensaios escritos pelo historiador Paul Veyne, que trata em primeiro lugar, do objetivo da história e depois passa a considerar as diversas formas de compreensão, finalizando com a noção do progresso histórico do ponto de vista sociológico. No segundo ensaio, intitulado 'Foucault revoluciona a história', o aut Em 'Como se escreve a história' estão reunidos dois dos melhores ensaios escritos pelo historiador Paul Veyne, que trata em primeiro lugar, do objetivo da história e depois passa a considerar as diversas formas de compreensão, finalizando com a noção do progresso histórico do ponto de vista sociológico. No segundo ensaio, intitulado 'Foucault revoluciona a história', o autor estuda o método revolucionário de análise histórica do famoso filósofo francês, começando pelo badalado termo de 'discurso', e concluindo com a descrição do método de trabalho de Foucault.


Compare

Em 'Como se escreve a história' estão reunidos dois dos melhores ensaios escritos pelo historiador Paul Veyne, que trata em primeiro lugar, do objetivo da história e depois passa a considerar as diversas formas de compreensão, finalizando com a noção do progresso histórico do ponto de vista sociológico. No segundo ensaio, intitulado 'Foucault revoluciona a história', o aut Em 'Como se escreve a história' estão reunidos dois dos melhores ensaios escritos pelo historiador Paul Veyne, que trata em primeiro lugar, do objetivo da história e depois passa a considerar as diversas formas de compreensão, finalizando com a noção do progresso histórico do ponto de vista sociológico. No segundo ensaio, intitulado 'Foucault revoluciona a história', o autor estuda o método revolucionário de análise histórica do famoso filósofo francês, começando pelo badalado termo de 'discurso', e concluindo com a descrição do método de trabalho de Foucault.

30 review for Como se escreve a História/Foucault: Revoluciona a História

  1. 5 out of 5

    عمر جوبا

    شعرت أن هذا الكتاب إجابة على أسئلة كثيرة منها ماهية التاريخ؟ في الكتاب يجيب الكاتب عن الأسئلة على الشاكلة هذه، مستعرضًا فيه وقائع تاريخية عالمية، يجيب من خلالها على التساؤلات المطروحة حول التاريخ. ويبين بول فيين في الكتاب مناهج التاريخ، وأهمية المناهج المتبعة في الكتابة التاريخية، وبعد أغلب المناهج المعاصرة عن الطريق السليم لكتابة التاريخ. بشكل عام الكتاب مفصلي ومهم جدًا لكنه يحتاج إلى صبر وعدة قراءات مدعمة له حتى لا يتوه القارئ بين ما يقدمه فيين وما يعرفه ويؤمن به.

  2. 4 out of 5

    عبدالله العبيد

    الكتاب ممتاز و هو يعد ثورة في الكتابة التاريخية الفرنسية في ظل هيمنة مدرسة الحوليات لكن الترجمة جدا سيئة

  3. 4 out of 5

    Hussain Yhea

    يقوم هذا الكتاب على تعريف ماهية التاريخ والعوائق التي يقابلها في كونه تاريخا....

  4. 4 out of 5

    Boris

    There are many important ideas in this book about the nature of historiography, but I felt that it often was too much of a polemic to develop them carefully and clearly for the reader. The book therefore reads as if every single sentences is written in capital letters, followed by multiple exclamation marks. There are hardly any glimpses of the overall argument during the book, so that one is sucked into dense discussions with sources that one may or may not know, as Veyne presupposes a vast amo There are many important ideas in this book about the nature of historiography, but I felt that it often was too much of a polemic to develop them carefully and clearly for the reader. The book therefore reads as if every single sentences is written in capital letters, followed by multiple exclamation marks. There are hardly any glimpses of the overall argument during the book, so that one is sucked into dense discussions with sources that one may or may not know, as Veyne presupposes a vast amount of knowledge about 20th century sociology and history. It is up to the reader to occasionally rise to the surface to gasp for air and to see where she is in the larger picture that Writing History attempts to sketch. If one is willing to enter this philosophical roller coaster, one is likely to feel dazzled and surprised, like I do now, but once the dizziness yields, I think that there is a powerful core to be found in Veyne, that ties nominalism to narrative theory, that explains well why history is concerned with the specific and why it will never become a science. EDIT: a week later, I have started to appreciate the book more. Rereading helps.

  5. 5 out of 5

    Marc

    Read some of it, when I was 19, as a university student. Very concise reading.

  6. 5 out of 5

    Abdulrahman

  7. 5 out of 5

    Eric

  8. 4 out of 5

    Rafael

  9. 5 out of 5

    Silvian Iacob

  10. 5 out of 5

    Natalia

  11. 5 out of 5

    Boris

  12. 4 out of 5

    Carolina

  13. 5 out of 5

    Sense of History

  14. 4 out of 5

    Maria Julia

  15. 4 out of 5

    Hélène Lamboley

  16. 4 out of 5

    Luís Santa

  17. 4 out of 5

    Fx Garneau

  18. 4 out of 5

    Beatriz

  19. 5 out of 5

    Taciano Dreckmann Perez

  20. 5 out of 5

    Rabuna

  21. 5 out of 5

    Casper Kemp

  22. 4 out of 5

    Castanié

  23. 4 out of 5

    muge

  24. 5 out of 5

    Christopher Staak

  25. 5 out of 5

    André de Sá

  26. 5 out of 5

    Ana Lopes

  27. 4 out of 5

    Joana Ribeiro

  28. 4 out of 5

    Dinu

  29. 4 out of 5

    Arthur Mora

  30. 4 out of 5

    Savas

Add a review

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Loading...
We use cookies to give you the best online experience. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy.