web site hit counter First Course in Mathematical Logic - Ebooks PDF Online
Hot Best Seller

First Course in Mathematical Logic

Availability: Ready to download

Starting with symbolizing sentences and sentential connectives, this work proceeds to the rules of logical inference and sentential derivation, examines the concepts of truth and validity, and presents a series of truth tables. Subsequent topics include terms, predicates, and universal quantifiers; universal specification and laws of identity; axioms for addition; and univ Starting with symbolizing sentences and sentential connectives, this work proceeds to the rules of logical inference and sentential derivation, examines the concepts of truth and validity, and presents a series of truth tables. Subsequent topics include terms, predicates, and universal quantifiers; universal specification and laws of identity; axioms for addition; and universal generalization. 1964 edition. Index.


Compare

Starting with symbolizing sentences and sentential connectives, this work proceeds to the rules of logical inference and sentential derivation, examines the concepts of truth and validity, and presents a series of truth tables. Subsequent topics include terms, predicates, and universal quantifiers; universal specification and laws of identity; axioms for addition; and univ Starting with symbolizing sentences and sentential connectives, this work proceeds to the rules of logical inference and sentential derivation, examines the concepts of truth and validity, and presents a series of truth tables. Subsequent topics include terms, predicates, and universal quantifiers; universal specification and laws of identity; axioms for addition; and universal generalization. 1964 edition. Index.

39 review for First Course in Mathematical Logic

  1. 5 out of 5

    Stephen

    The exercises in the beginning reminded me of grammar exercises from the 1st grade--so fun. I do not remember ever having a class in logic, even though I was tutoring students in the course for a couple of years. This book is not just for mathematicians, but for anybody interested in understanding logical arguments (No mathematical experience is necessary -- NONE, seriously). I would honestly recommend anyone in Law school to take a peek at this book; if they are not able to do the proofs, then The exercises in the beginning reminded me of grammar exercises from the 1st grade--so fun. I do not remember ever having a class in logic, even though I was tutoring students in the course for a couple of years. This book is not just for mathematicians, but for anybody interested in understanding logical arguments (No mathematical experience is necessary -- NONE, seriously). I would honestly recommend anyone in Law school to take a peek at this book; if they are not able to do the proofs, then perhaps they should choose another line of work.

  2. 4 out of 5

    João Vaz

    Great fun! Highly recommend it to anyone interested in making their arguments bulletproof or in how to prove that 1+1 = 2.

  3. 4 out of 5

    Logan Borges

    Great in the beginning but starting from chapter 6 you have to make certain jumps that aren't explained or showcased early on. Had they been accounted for, this would have been a perfect 5 stars. One may benefit from reading Suppes' "Introduction to Logic" before jumping into this, at least for the everything from chapter 6 and upwards. Despite my gripes with the chapter 6 and above, everything before it is presented perfectly. One could not find a more clear guide to learning and practicing math Great in the beginning but starting from chapter 6 you have to make certain jumps that aren't explained or showcased early on. Had they been accounted for, this would have been a perfect 5 stars. One may benefit from reading Suppes' "Introduction to Logic" before jumping into this, at least for the everything from chapter 6 and upwards. Despite my gripes with the chapter 6 and above, everything before it is presented perfectly. One could not find a more clear guide to learning and practicing mathematical logic than this. I would still buy this despite my current rating.

  4. 4 out of 5

    N/A

  5. 5 out of 5

    TK Keanini

  6. 5 out of 5

    Lieb

  7. 4 out of 5

    Tim Shores

  8. 5 out of 5

    William Chan

  9. 4 out of 5

    Patrick C.

  10. 5 out of 5

    Michael Lloyd-Billington

  11. 4 out of 5

    Matias

  12. 5 out of 5

    Ryandmp

  13. 4 out of 5

    SANNI

  14. 4 out of 5

    Preeti

  15. 5 out of 5

    Liquidlasagna

  16. 5 out of 5

    Edgar Martinez

  17. 4 out of 5

    Valerie

  18. 5 out of 5

    Ariel Herrera

  19. 4 out of 5

    Acacio de Barros

  20. 4 out of 5

    Scott

  21. 5 out of 5

    Dan

  22. 5 out of 5

    Fey

  23. 5 out of 5

    Simon

  24. 4 out of 5

    Vijay Veeraraghavan

  25. 4 out of 5

    Anthony

  26. 4 out of 5

    Joe

  27. 5 out of 5

    Dvdlynch

  28. 4 out of 5

    Michael Mcdonough

  29. 5 out of 5

    Paolo Gianlucca

  30. 5 out of 5

    Wendelle

  31. 5 out of 5

    Pierre Franckx

  32. 5 out of 5

    Leonardo Masolini

  33. 5 out of 5

    pplofgod

  34. 5 out of 5

    Priyadharshni

  35. 4 out of 5

    Evin Ashley

  36. 4 out of 5

    محمد

  37. 5 out of 5

    BookDB

  38. 4 out of 5

    Arash Ashrafzadeh

  39. 4 out of 5

    Victor Plamenov

Add a review

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Loading...
We use cookies to give you the best online experience. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy.