web site hit counter Myths of Gender: Biological Theories about Women and Men - Ebooks PDF Online
Hot Best Seller

Myths of Gender: Biological Theories about Women and Men

Availability: Ready to download

By carefully examining the biological, genetic, evolutionary, and psychological evidence, a noted biologist finds a shocking lack of substance behind ideas about biologically based sex differences. Features a new chapter and afterward on recent biological breakthroughs.


Compare

By carefully examining the biological, genetic, evolutionary, and psychological evidence, a noted biologist finds a shocking lack of substance behind ideas about biologically based sex differences. Features a new chapter and afterward on recent biological breakthroughs.

30 review for Myths of Gender: Biological Theories about Women and Men

  1. 4 out of 5

    Alok Vaid-Menon

    As pseudoscience used to justify racial stereotypes continues to be debunked, myths about sexual difference still remain understood as “biological truths.” Dr. Fausto-Sterling, professor of Biology at Brown University, engages in an exhaustive review of scientific research on intelligence, genes, hormones, aggression, evolution, and brain composition to reveal that there are actually very few absolute sex differences between males and females and that – actually – without complete equality betwe As pseudoscience used to justify racial stereotypes continues to be debunked, myths about sexual difference still remain understood as “biological truths.” Dr. Fausto-Sterling, professor of Biology at Brown University, engages in an exhaustive review of scientific research on intelligence, genes, hormones, aggression, evolution, and brain composition to reveal that there are actually very few absolute sex differences between males and females and that – actually – without complete equality between sexes, we cannot actually know what they are. In fact, there is more biological variation among women and among men than between them. Broad over-arching categories like “sex” and “race” oversimplify biology and ignore interactions between organisms and their environments. There is no direct correlation between genes and physical expression: genes have multiple potential expressions and biological phenotypes are produced from a complex combination of an individual’s developmental and environmental history and their genes. Dr. Fausto-Sterling does not argue for erasing biology, but rather argues against biological essentialism – the idea that biology is the only approach to understand humankind. Of course, biology shapes behavior, but behavior can also alter physiology. The physical structure of our brains and bodies are impacted not just by our genes, but also our nutrition, exercise, physical contact with other humans, exposure to trauma and various stimuli, and more. To illustrate the dangers of biological essentialism, Dr. Fausto-Sterling reviews how scientists historically justified discrimination against women in the name of “scientific truth.” Scientists have argued that men were smarter than women, that women were inherently irrational and incapable of maintaining leadership positions, that women should not attend higher education because it would compromise their reproductive systems, that women are inherently diseased, and that women were only fit for “sedentary occupations” and should remain at home because they were weaker than men. There is no apolitical science. Scientist are humans shaped by the political and cultural value systems they are part of and the literature on sexual difference is informed by the cultural assumption of a Western binary sex-gender model. So-called “objective fields” like biology are not innocent of their own non-conscious and hidden biases.

  2. 5 out of 5

    Les

    A brilliant demolition of the bad science behind gender-role-affirming memes like "men have better visual-spacial perception than women". While much of the book looks at work from the late 70s and early 80s, some of the ideas are still "common knowledge" today, and the sort of bad science (or at least bad science reporting) that perpetuates those myths is still being done. A brilliant demolition of the bad science behind gender-role-affirming memes like "men have better visual-spacial perception than women". While much of the book looks at work from the late 70s and early 80s, some of the ideas are still "common knowledge" today, and the sort of bad science (or at least bad science reporting) that perpetuates those myths is still being done.

  3. 5 out of 5

    Zach

    Biology is not a one-way determinant but a dynamic component of our existence. A surprisingly funny (in a totally snarky way) attack on both positivist essentialism and the idea that science could exist in a political vacuum.

  4. 5 out of 5

    Belenen

    Written by a medical doctor, Myths of Gender explores studies on 'gender', focusing on the medical aspects. Fausto-Sterling discusses genes, hormones, brain differences, animal behavior, homosexuality, and how science affects society. Succinct, objective, and fascinating. Written by a medical doctor, Myths of Gender explores studies on 'gender', focusing on the medical aspects. Fausto-Sterling discusses genes, hormones, brain differences, animal behavior, homosexuality, and how science affects society. Succinct, objective, and fascinating.

  5. 5 out of 5

    Andrew

    Fausto-Sterling challenges the assertions of certain brain scientists and geneticists (among others), and offers a history of scientific misconceptions based on biology. Her main argument is that these gender myths are used to defend or protect the status quo.

  6. 4 out of 5

    Ronald Lett

    An excellent overview and deconstruction of several often cited studies. Beyond the specific studies cited, it offers great extensive analysis on how the methodology of experiments can be both purposefully and unknowingly biased if they are not carefully designed. Citation of older studies especially is problematic when the language and words used have different intrinsic definitions. Although this book is a little older, and has some outdated ideas in the area of neuroscience (which has recentl An excellent overview and deconstruction of several often cited studies. Beyond the specific studies cited, it offers great extensive analysis on how the methodology of experiments can be both purposefully and unknowingly biased if they are not carefully designed. Citation of older studies especially is problematic when the language and words used have different intrinsic definitions. Although this book is a little older, and has some outdated ideas in the area of neuroscience (which has recently exploded with data and new models), it is still well worth the read. This dialogue continues in Delusions of Gender: How Our Minds, Society, and Neurosexism Create Difference and Brainstorm: The Flaws in the Science of Sex Differences, which have more up-to-date, but slightly different, discussions.

  7. 4 out of 5

    Nancy

    Tons of evidence, plus some sharp insight into the weakness of many "studies" on gender difference. Fausto-Sterling dissects commonly held beliefs, neatly comparing what's produced as evidence, but also things that "experts" on gender difference spout from their perches in academia and media. The writing is frequently dry and didactic, but readable. Occasionally, however, Fausto-Sterling shifts into a more conversational or even sardonic tone, and that's when the book comes alive. Tons of evidence, plus some sharp insight into the weakness of many "studies" on gender difference. Fausto-Sterling dissects commonly held beliefs, neatly comparing what's produced as evidence, but also things that "experts" on gender difference spout from their perches in academia and media. The writing is frequently dry and didactic, but readable. Occasionally, however, Fausto-Sterling shifts into a more conversational or even sardonic tone, and that's when the book comes alive.

  8. 5 out of 5

    Aubri

    It was an interesting read and the author made many good points about research and methods used to enforce our "age old" myths about gender. My only complaint is the book's age; some of the content is outdated. I'd be very interested to read an updated version with commentary regarding new research. It was an interesting read and the author made many good points about research and methods used to enforce our "age old" myths about gender. My only complaint is the book's age; some of the content is outdated. I'd be very interested to read an updated version with commentary regarding new research.

  9. 4 out of 5

    kylajaclyn

    This book is crushingly hard to get through, but I had to for the sake of my Sociology of Women class. I understand what Fausto-Sterling is trying to do here - proving that the "differences of biology" between men and women are tenuous at best - but this book is so steeped in science and theories and that sort of talk that I often fell asleep. I am more interested in the differences between men and women from a psychological and women's studies point of view. Not that the sociological should be This book is crushingly hard to get through, but I had to for the sake of my Sociology of Women class. I understand what Fausto-Sterling is trying to do here - proving that the "differences of biology" between men and women are tenuous at best - but this book is so steeped in science and theories and that sort of talk that I often fell asleep. I am more interested in the differences between men and women from a psychological and women's studies point of view. Not that the sociological should be ignored, I'm just praying that the rest of the books we have to read are far more interesting than this one. If you are a biology fiend and love dense scientific talk then this book won't be a problem for you. But I like a little entertainment with my education... or at least more philosophical and easier language to swallow. I didn't have any "aha!" moment because this book was just fact after fact. I think Malcolm Gladwell always manages to make science fascinating... but Fausto-Sterling? Not so much with this one.

  10. 5 out of 5

    Miranda Sofe Nelson

    Some good information, a little bit research heavy for my taste (I do better with philosophy than fact, sometimes) but it was well written and persuasive. However, I think the nature vs. nurture debate, in any sense, is an impossible question to properly study. And even if we could find accurate information swaying one way or the other, does answering this question really help us? Part of being human involves the natural desire to fight your nature, to progress and become better. And if you beli Some good information, a little bit research heavy for my taste (I do better with philosophy than fact, sometimes) but it was well written and persuasive. However, I think the nature vs. nurture debate, in any sense, is an impossible question to properly study. And even if we could find accurate information swaying one way or the other, does answering this question really help us? Part of being human involves the natural desire to fight your nature, to progress and become better. And if you believe that, what does it matter if women are biologically handicapped when sexism is a morality issue worth fighting to overcome?

  11. 4 out of 5

    Haris Zofos

    More Fausto-Sterlings in this world, please

  12. 5 out of 5

    Scott B

    Fascinating that Fausto-Sterling picks about a hundred different scientific 'female inferiority/male-dominated society' claims and just devastates them, showing their problem-riddled studies with details about their neglect to noticing sociological bias and variables. It was a WEE bit science-y, though. My main issue is that it doesn't come off as a book to sway anyone who would be thinking differently and reads like a biology textbook half the time, with pages of completely unnecessary factual Fascinating that Fausto-Sterling picks about a hundred different scientific 'female inferiority/male-dominated society' claims and just devastates them, showing their problem-riddled studies with details about their neglect to noticing sociological bias and variables. It was a WEE bit science-y, though. My main issue is that it doesn't come off as a book to sway anyone who would be thinking differently and reads like a biology textbook half the time, with pages of completely unnecessary factual explanation every chapter.

  13. 4 out of 5

    Caitlin

    This book is, as they say, an oldie but a goodie - still shockingly relevant. Fausto-Sterling dives into the nitty-gritty of the biology of gender - what it is and what it isn't - which reveals the sociology of science, how science can be biased and flawed. A really good read for anyone wanting a better understanding of gender. This book is, as they say, an oldie but a goodie - still shockingly relevant. Fausto-Sterling dives into the nitty-gritty of the biology of gender - what it is and what it isn't - which reveals the sociology of science, how science can be biased and flawed. A really good read for anyone wanting a better understanding of gender.

  14. 4 out of 5

    Jaden

    Very interesting book to read. It seemed very "textbook" at times, but the author does a wonderful job of throwing in snarky comments from time to time and elegantly shooting certain theorie down. This is the kind of book that I would suggest you only read if you have a genuine interest and some background in the topic. Very interesting book to read. It seemed very "textbook" at times, but the author does a wonderful job of throwing in snarky comments from time to time and elegantly shooting certain theorie down. This is the kind of book that I would suggest you only read if you have a genuine interest and some background in the topic.

  15. 4 out of 5

    nicole

    she's fun, funny, and smart. she's fun, funny, and smart.

  16. 4 out of 5

    Jim

    Excellent! Review coming soon...

  17. 4 out of 5

    William

    Utter rubbish...

  18. 5 out of 5

    Amy Greenwell

  19. 4 out of 5

    Melissa Gibson

  20. 5 out of 5

    Sarah Moga

  21. 5 out of 5

    Dayana Acevedo-Rios

  22. 4 out of 5

    B

  23. 5 out of 5

    Jason

  24. 4 out of 5

    Caitlin

  25. 4 out of 5

    Pj

  26. 4 out of 5

    Athena

  27. 5 out of 5

    Daisy

  28. 5 out of 5

    Paul

  29. 4 out of 5

    Nebuchadnezzar

  30. 5 out of 5

    Masahiro Caldwell Jackson

Add a review

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Loading...
We use cookies to give you the best online experience. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy.