web site hit counter Counterfactual Thought Experiments in World Politics: Logical, Methodological, and Psychological Perspectives - Ebooks PDF Online
Hot Best Seller

Counterfactual Thought Experiments in World Politics: Logical, Methodological, and Psychological Perspectives

Availability: Ready to download

Political scientists often ask themselves what might have been if history had unfolded differently: if Stalin had been ousted as General Party Secretary or if the United States had not dropped the bomb on Japan. Although scholars sometimes scoff at applying hypothetical reasoning to world politics, the contributors to this volume--including James Fearon, Richard Lebow, Mar Political scientists often ask themselves what might have been if history had unfolded differently: if Stalin had been ousted as General Party Secretary or if the United States had not dropped the bomb on Japan. Although scholars sometimes scoff at applying hypothetical reasoning to world politics, the contributors to this volume--including James Fearon, Richard Lebow, Margaret Levi, Bruce Russett, and Barry Weingast--find such counterfactual conjectures not only useful, but necessary for drawing causal inferences from historical data. Given the importance of counterfactuals, it is perhaps surprising that we lack standards for evaluating them. To fill this gap, Philip Tetlock and Aaron Belkin propose a set of criteria for distinguishing plausible from implausible counterfactual conjectures across a wide range of applications. The contributors to this volume make use of these and other criteria to evaluate counterfactuals that emerge in diverse methodological contexts including comparative case studies, game theory, and statistical analysis. Taken together, these essays go a long way toward establishing a more nuanced and rigorous framework for assessing counterfactual arguments about world politics in particular and about the social sciences more broadly.


Compare

Political scientists often ask themselves what might have been if history had unfolded differently: if Stalin had been ousted as General Party Secretary or if the United States had not dropped the bomb on Japan. Although scholars sometimes scoff at applying hypothetical reasoning to world politics, the contributors to this volume--including James Fearon, Richard Lebow, Mar Political scientists often ask themselves what might have been if history had unfolded differently: if Stalin had been ousted as General Party Secretary or if the United States had not dropped the bomb on Japan. Although scholars sometimes scoff at applying hypothetical reasoning to world politics, the contributors to this volume--including James Fearon, Richard Lebow, Margaret Levi, Bruce Russett, and Barry Weingast--find such counterfactual conjectures not only useful, but necessary for drawing causal inferences from historical data. Given the importance of counterfactuals, it is perhaps surprising that we lack standards for evaluating them. To fill this gap, Philip Tetlock and Aaron Belkin propose a set of criteria for distinguishing plausible from implausible counterfactual conjectures across a wide range of applications. The contributors to this volume make use of these and other criteria to evaluate counterfactuals that emerge in diverse methodological contexts including comparative case studies, game theory, and statistical analysis. Taken together, these essays go a long way toward establishing a more nuanced and rigorous framework for assessing counterfactual arguments about world politics in particular and about the social sciences more broadly.

37 review for Counterfactual Thought Experiments in World Politics: Logical, Methodological, and Psychological Perspectives

  1. 5 out of 5

    Hamza Moussa

  2. 5 out of 5

    Victoria Adams

  3. 5 out of 5

    Chris

  4. 4 out of 5

    Schoolofnight

  5. 5 out of 5

    Eric Thrond

  6. 5 out of 5

    Wodin

  7. 5 out of 5

    ne

  8. 5 out of 5

    Tom Russell

  9. 4 out of 5

    K.K. Edin

  10. 5 out of 5

    Jad Madi

  11. 5 out of 5

    Graham

  12. 4 out of 5

    Sharon Reishus

  13. 5 out of 5

    John

  14. 4 out of 5

    Kevin

  15. 4 out of 5

    Russell Boag

  16. 4 out of 5

    Vikas Datta

  17. 5 out of 5

    Natalie

  18. 5 out of 5

    Tarek

  19. 4 out of 5

    Allison

  20. 4 out of 5

    Jamie

  21. 5 out of 5

    Manifest Stefany

  22. 4 out of 5

    Guy

  23. 4 out of 5

    Sean

  24. 5 out of 5

    Joseph

  25. 4 out of 5

    Ryan

  26. 4 out of 5

    Seth Jolly

  27. 4 out of 5

    Mihnea Maftei

  28. 5 out of 5

    Jeremy Russell

  29. 5 out of 5

    Una Dimitrijevic

  30. 4 out of 5

    Bobby Lin

  31. 5 out of 5

    book

  32. 4 out of 5

    LPenting

  33. 5 out of 5

    Igor

  34. 4 out of 5

    Leah

  35. 4 out of 5

    Barron

  36. 4 out of 5

    Daniel

  37. 5 out of 5

    Donald Forster

Add a review

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Loading...
We use cookies to give you the best online experience. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy.