First published in 1971, Professor Putnam's essay concerns itself with the ontological problem in the philosophy of logic and mathematics - that is, the issue of whether the abstract entities spoken of in logic and mathematics really exist. He also deals with the question of whether or not reference to these abstract entities is really indispensible in logic and whether it First published in 1971, Professor Putnam's essay concerns itself with the ontological problem in the philosophy of logic and mathematics - that is, the issue of whether the abstract entities spoken of in logic and mathematics really exist. He also deals with the question of whether or not reference to these abstract entities is really indispensible in logic and whether it is necessary in physical science in general.
Philosophy of Logic
First published in 1971, Professor Putnam's essay concerns itself with the ontological problem in the philosophy of logic and mathematics - that is, the issue of whether the abstract entities spoken of in logic and mathematics really exist. He also deals with the question of whether or not reference to these abstract entities is really indispensible in logic and whether it First published in 1971, Professor Putnam's essay concerns itself with the ontological problem in the philosophy of logic and mathematics - that is, the issue of whether the abstract entities spoken of in logic and mathematics really exist. He also deals with the question of whether or not reference to these abstract entities is really indispensible in logic and whether it is necessary in physical science in general.
Compare
Related products
Truck Stop Whore & Dumb Sluts: 3 book pack
So You Want to be a Truck Driver (BigRigEbooks Book 1)
The Trucker's Wife 6: Who'll Stop the Rayne?
The Trucker's Wife 2: Bring on the Rayne
Dynamic Dumper Truck
Shadows of Evil: Long-haul Trucker Wayne Adam Ford and His Grisly Trail of Rape, Dismemberment, and Murder
Captain Duck
David Scarratt –
If this is the book I think it is -- and I think it is -- then I think it's essentially an extended argument against nominalism, of the Nelson Goodman kind. But I read it a long time ago when I was even more of a novice in philosophy than I am now, so I may be misremembering a poor understanding. If this is the book I think it is -- and I think it is -- then I think it's essentially an extended argument against nominalism, of the Nelson Goodman kind. But I read it a long time ago when I was even more of a novice in philosophy than I am now, so I may be misremembering a poor understanding.
Aron van der Beek –
MoonishT –
Stephen Yablo –
Josiah Lopez-Wild –
Nick Wilson –
Maja Krych –
Paul Oppenheimer –
Sebastian Barrymore –
Gavin –
M R –
Federico Ponzoni –
Gerardo Suarez –
Ian Van –
Christian Giliberto –
Alexandre Guay –
Mostfa –
Pranciskusgri –
Joshua Jarrott –
Ahmed –
Cyberdionysos –
Espen –
Mary Kay –
Pilcrow –
Leo Horovitz –
Creative –
Ryan Coons –
Johnny –
Eliška –
Christopher –
Kat Steiner –
Joe –
David Sjolander –
Chris –
Shindy –
J. –
Secret Name –
Stm2010 –
Skeptical Leftist –
Rebecca –
Peter Stanbridge –
Yan Kai –