web site hit counter Maps and Coins vs History: Neither antiquity maps produced in XVI-XVII, nor Roman or Greek ancient coins can serve for dating of events (History: Fiction or Science? Book 17) - Ebooks PDF Online
Hot Best Seller

Maps and Coins vs History: Neither antiquity maps produced in XVI-XVII, nor Roman or Greek ancient coins can serve for dating of events (History: Fiction or Science? Book 17)

Availability: Ready to download

'Maps and Coins vs. History', from the e-series History: Fiction or Science? shows You that scores of maps and hoards of coins contradict consensual world history. 'Maps and Coins vs. History' questions the numismatics per se. Dr Fomenko et al take a close look at maps of XIV-XVIII that confirm the theory of New Chronology and point to existance of Empire present nearly ov 'Maps and Coins vs. History', from the e-series History: Fiction or Science? shows You that scores of maps and hoards of coins contradict consensual world history. 'Maps and Coins vs. History' questions the numismatics per se. Dr Fomenko et al take a close look at maps of XIV-XVIII that confirm the theory of New Chronology and point to existance of Empire present nearly over all of Eurasia. They analyse the spread all over Europe of hoards of coins, they note numerous peculiarites like coins of Kings, Princes minted with arab, turkic inscriptions. The book contains data, illustrations, charts and formulae containing irrefutable evidence of mathematical, statistical and astronomical nature. Feel free to use them in your eventual discussions with the avid devotees of classical chronology. In fact, before reading this book, you have most probably been one of such devotees. After reading books of 'History: Fiction or Science?' series you will develop a more critical attitude to the dominating historical discourse or even become its antagonist.You will be confronted with natural disbelief when you share what you’ve learned with others. Now you are very well armed in face of inevitable scepticism. This book contains enough solid evidence to silence any historian by the sheer power of facts and argumentation. History: Fiction or Science? is the most explosive tractate on history ever written – however, every theory it contains, no matter how unorthodox, is backed by solid scientific data. The dominating historical discourse in its current state was essentially crafted in the XVI century from a rather contradictory jumble of sources such as innumerable copies of ancient Latin and Greek manuscripts whose originals had vanished in the Dark Ages and the allegedly irrefutable proof offered by late mediaeval astronomers, resting upon the power of ecclesial authorities. Nearly all of its components are blatantly untrue! For some of us, it shall possibly be quite disturbing to see the magnificent edifice of classical history to turn into an ominous simulacrum brooding over the snake pit of mediaeval politics. Twice so, in fact: the first seeing the legendary millenarian dust on the ancient marble turn into a mere layer of dirt – one that meticulous unprejudiced research can eventually remove.The second, and greater, attack of unease comes with the awareness of just how any areas of human knowledge still trust the elephants, turtles and whales of the consensual chronology to support them. Nothing can remedy that except for an individual chronological revolution happening in the minds of a large enough number of people.


Compare

'Maps and Coins vs. History', from the e-series History: Fiction or Science? shows You that scores of maps and hoards of coins contradict consensual world history. 'Maps and Coins vs. History' questions the numismatics per se. Dr Fomenko et al take a close look at maps of XIV-XVIII that confirm the theory of New Chronology and point to existance of Empire present nearly ov 'Maps and Coins vs. History', from the e-series History: Fiction or Science? shows You that scores of maps and hoards of coins contradict consensual world history. 'Maps and Coins vs. History' questions the numismatics per se. Dr Fomenko et al take a close look at maps of XIV-XVIII that confirm the theory of New Chronology and point to existance of Empire present nearly over all of Eurasia. They analyse the spread all over Europe of hoards of coins, they note numerous peculiarites like coins of Kings, Princes minted with arab, turkic inscriptions. The book contains data, illustrations, charts and formulae containing irrefutable evidence of mathematical, statistical and astronomical nature. Feel free to use them in your eventual discussions with the avid devotees of classical chronology. In fact, before reading this book, you have most probably been one of such devotees. After reading books of 'History: Fiction or Science?' series you will develop a more critical attitude to the dominating historical discourse or even become its antagonist.You will be confronted with natural disbelief when you share what you’ve learned with others. Now you are very well armed in face of inevitable scepticism. This book contains enough solid evidence to silence any historian by the sheer power of facts and argumentation. History: Fiction or Science? is the most explosive tractate on history ever written – however, every theory it contains, no matter how unorthodox, is backed by solid scientific data. The dominating historical discourse in its current state was essentially crafted in the XVI century from a rather contradictory jumble of sources such as innumerable copies of ancient Latin and Greek manuscripts whose originals had vanished in the Dark Ages and the allegedly irrefutable proof offered by late mediaeval astronomers, resting upon the power of ecclesial authorities. Nearly all of its components are blatantly untrue! For some of us, it shall possibly be quite disturbing to see the magnificent edifice of classical history to turn into an ominous simulacrum brooding over the snake pit of mediaeval politics. Twice so, in fact: the first seeing the legendary millenarian dust on the ancient marble turn into a mere layer of dirt – one that meticulous unprejudiced research can eventually remove.The second, and greater, attack of unease comes with the awareness of just how any areas of human knowledge still trust the elephants, turtles and whales of the consensual chronology to support them. Nothing can remedy that except for an individual chronological revolution happening in the minds of a large enough number of people.

14 review for Maps and Coins vs History: Neither antiquity maps produced in XVI-XVII, nor Roman or Greek ancient coins can serve for dating of events (History: Fiction or Science? Book 17)

  1. 4 out of 5

    Guy Eric

  2. 5 out of 5

    Dxxx

  3. 4 out of 5

    Ysa

  4. 5 out of 5

    Austin Bunton

  5. 5 out of 5

    Amy Smith

  6. 5 out of 5

    Elizabeth Anne Shaw

  7. 4 out of 5

    taffeta timmons

  8. 4 out of 5

    Cary kenney

  9. 4 out of 5

    Lou McDonald

  10. 4 out of 5

    Den coelho

  11. 5 out of 5

    Christeen Ashraf

  12. 4 out of 5

    Killian Alawi

  13. 4 out of 5

    Kevin

  14. 5 out of 5

    Maria Pereira

Add a review

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Loading...
We use cookies to give you the best online experience. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy.