First published in 1967, Muslim Cities in the Later Middle Ages is one of the most influential works in the field of Islamic history. Primarily a study of the main cities of the Mamluk state of the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries AD, Professor Lapidus' book serves to provide a framework for understanding the long evolution of Muslim political and social institutions and First published in 1967, Muslim Cities in the Later Middle Ages is one of the most influential works in the field of Islamic history. Primarily a study of the main cities of the Mamluk state of the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries AD, Professor Lapidus' book serves to provide a framework for understanding the long evolution of Muslim political and social institutions and urban societies. The relationships between military rulers, the bourgeoisie and the common people are presented in a study of wide relevance to social history.
Muslim Cities in the Later Middle Ages
First published in 1967, Muslim Cities in the Later Middle Ages is one of the most influential works in the field of Islamic history. Primarily a study of the main cities of the Mamluk state of the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries AD, Professor Lapidus' book serves to provide a framework for understanding the long evolution of Muslim political and social institutions and First published in 1967, Muslim Cities in the Later Middle Ages is one of the most influential works in the field of Islamic history. Primarily a study of the main cities of the Mamluk state of the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries AD, Professor Lapidus' book serves to provide a framework for understanding the long evolution of Muslim political and social institutions and urban societies. The relationships between military rulers, the bourgeoisie and the common people are presented in a study of wide relevance to social history.
Compare
cee –
i think it's a good analysis but it's a little dry and largely just makes me want to find more recent scholarship on the same topic i think it's a good analysis but it's a little dry and largely just makes me want to find more recent scholarship on the same topic
Goran Ovčariček –
To keep it short, though this book holds some descriptive value it is ultimately severely tainted, in terms of a historiographical work, by the author's own ideology. Lapidus' Marxism has him constantly seeking progressive elements and explaining what thwarted their evolution, and besides that, the use of Marxist terminology (such as the "Sultan's secretariat", or "lumpenproletariat") to describe the events in the 14th and 15th centuries is simply unacceptable. To keep it short, though this book holds some descriptive value it is ultimately severely tainted, in terms of a historiographical work, by the author's own ideology. Lapidus' Marxism has him constantly seeking progressive elements and explaining what thwarted their evolution, and besides that, the use of Marxist terminology (such as the "Sultan's secretariat", or "lumpenproletariat") to describe the events in the 14th and 15th centuries is simply unacceptable.
Fadil –
Deniz Kılınçoğlu –
Ali –
Dalal –
Ekul –
Omar –
Azzam To'meh –
Timothy –
Jen –
Arash Tadjiki –
Alim –
Mesut Agir –
Jbondandrews –
Yasmin –
Ahmed Hussien –
Bill Tucker –
nefou –
bananananas –
Sophie –
Augustus Brightman –
Assad –
Silverfox –
Hend –
Ayman Fadel –
Tarek –
Raffaele Mauriello –
Moon Eays –
Shahid –
Alex Spentzaris –
Alinor Ali –
Abdallah Mostafa Fayed –
Hotei –
أدهم هاني –
Fien De Block –
Jasmin Kocaer –
LPenting –
Bahman –
Mesut Agir –
AhmadF7822 –