web site hit counter Breaking the Spell: The Holocaust, Myth & Reality - Ebooks PDF Online
Hot Best Seller

Breaking the Spell: The Holocaust, Myth & Reality

Availability: Ready to download

In 1941, British Intelligence analysts cracked the German "Enigma" code. This undermined the German war effort - but also threw new light on day-by-day events in the Nazi concentration camp system. Between January 1942 and January 1943, encrypted radio communications between those camps and the Berlin headquarters were intercepted and decrypted. Oddly enough, historians ha In 1941, British Intelligence analysts cracked the German "Enigma" code. This undermined the German war effort - but also threw new light on day-by-day events in the Nazi concentration camp system. Between January 1942 and January 1943, encrypted radio communications between those camps and the Berlin headquarters were intercepted and decrypted. Oddly enough, historians have largely ignored the information furnished in these intercepts relating to "arrivals," "departures," recorded deaths and other events at these camps. The only reasonable explanation for this embarrassing omission is that the intercepted data seriously contradicts, even refutes, the orthodox "Holocaust" narrative. The revealed information does not expose a program of mass murder and racial genocide. Quite the opposite: it reveals that the Germans were determined, desperate even, to reduce the death rate in their work camps, which was caused by catastrophic typhus epidemics. Were the British here hoodwinked by the Nazis, as some historians to this day try to claim-or is the truth both simpler and more shocking? In 1988 and 1991 forensic studies threw light on the question of whether or not the claimed gas chambers at Auschwitz had served as slaughter houses for hundreds of thousands of people. Both studies had concluded that the only facilities where Zyklon B gas had been used were hygienic rather than homicidal, killing bugs rather than Jews. Needless to say that these iconoclastic studies were ignored or in some countries even outlawed, and that their authors were ostracized and even imprisoned. Dr. Kollerstrom, a science historian, has taken these studies, which are in obvious, stark contrast to the widely accepted narrative, as a starting point for his own endeavour into the land of taboo. After he had published a brief paper summarizing what he thought the data forced him to conclude, he was thrown out of his College where he had been a member of staff for eleven years. In his book Breaking the Spell, Dr. Kollerstrom shows that "witness statements" supporting the human gas chamber narrative clearly clash with the available scientific data. He juxtaposes the commonly accepted ideas about a Nazi extermination policy toward the Jews with a wide array of mostly unchallenged, but usually unmentioned evidence pointing in a quite different direction, for instance: Zyklon B is a buzz word for the claimed Nazi mass murder, but all non-anecdotal evidence proves that this chemical was merely used as a pesticide in order to improve the inmates' health and reduce, not increase, camp mortality. Zyklon B applied in delousing chambers formed chemical compounds detectable to this day. No such compounds can be found, but ought to be expected, in the claimed homicidal gas chambers. The UK's intelligence decrypts prove that the German camp authorities were desperately trying to save their inmates' lives. "Six Million Jews threatened or killed" read 167 quotes from newspapers with that "news" spanning from 1900 to 1945, with a peak after World War ONE! Yes, one, not two! Germany has paid compensation to millions of Nazi victims, and Israel has implicitly admitted that many million Jews survived the Holocaust. A British archaeological team looked for traces of the claimed 800,000 victims of the Treblinka camp-and came back empty-handed. Dr. Kollerstrom concludes that the history of the Nazi "Holocaust" has been written by the victors with ulterior motives and that this history is distorted, exaggerated and largely wrong. He asserts that this history is, in truth, a great lie that distorts our common perceived reality and misdirects human history to this very day. With a foreword by Prof. Dr. James H. Fetzer; contains a bibliography and an index.


Compare

In 1941, British Intelligence analysts cracked the German "Enigma" code. This undermined the German war effort - but also threw new light on day-by-day events in the Nazi concentration camp system. Between January 1942 and January 1943, encrypted radio communications between those camps and the Berlin headquarters were intercepted and decrypted. Oddly enough, historians ha In 1941, British Intelligence analysts cracked the German "Enigma" code. This undermined the German war effort - but also threw new light on day-by-day events in the Nazi concentration camp system. Between January 1942 and January 1943, encrypted radio communications between those camps and the Berlin headquarters were intercepted and decrypted. Oddly enough, historians have largely ignored the information furnished in these intercepts relating to "arrivals," "departures," recorded deaths and other events at these camps. The only reasonable explanation for this embarrassing omission is that the intercepted data seriously contradicts, even refutes, the orthodox "Holocaust" narrative. The revealed information does not expose a program of mass murder and racial genocide. Quite the opposite: it reveals that the Germans were determined, desperate even, to reduce the death rate in their work camps, which was caused by catastrophic typhus epidemics. Were the British here hoodwinked by the Nazis, as some historians to this day try to claim-or is the truth both simpler and more shocking? In 1988 and 1991 forensic studies threw light on the question of whether or not the claimed gas chambers at Auschwitz had served as slaughter houses for hundreds of thousands of people. Both studies had concluded that the only facilities where Zyklon B gas had been used were hygienic rather than homicidal, killing bugs rather than Jews. Needless to say that these iconoclastic studies were ignored or in some countries even outlawed, and that their authors were ostracized and even imprisoned. Dr. Kollerstrom, a science historian, has taken these studies, which are in obvious, stark contrast to the widely accepted narrative, as a starting point for his own endeavour into the land of taboo. After he had published a brief paper summarizing what he thought the data forced him to conclude, he was thrown out of his College where he had been a member of staff for eleven years. In his book Breaking the Spell, Dr. Kollerstrom shows that "witness statements" supporting the human gas chamber narrative clearly clash with the available scientific data. He juxtaposes the commonly accepted ideas about a Nazi extermination policy toward the Jews with a wide array of mostly unchallenged, but usually unmentioned evidence pointing in a quite different direction, for instance: Zyklon B is a buzz word for the claimed Nazi mass murder, but all non-anecdotal evidence proves that this chemical was merely used as a pesticide in order to improve the inmates' health and reduce, not increase, camp mortality. Zyklon B applied in delousing chambers formed chemical compounds detectable to this day. No such compounds can be found, but ought to be expected, in the claimed homicidal gas chambers. The UK's intelligence decrypts prove that the German camp authorities were desperately trying to save their inmates' lives. "Six Million Jews threatened or killed" read 167 quotes from newspapers with that "news" spanning from 1900 to 1945, with a peak after World War ONE! Yes, one, not two! Germany has paid compensation to millions of Nazi victims, and Israel has implicitly admitted that many million Jews survived the Holocaust. A British archaeological team looked for traces of the claimed 800,000 victims of the Treblinka camp-and came back empty-handed. Dr. Kollerstrom concludes that the history of the Nazi "Holocaust" has been written by the victors with ulterior motives and that this history is distorted, exaggerated and largely wrong. He asserts that this history is, in truth, a great lie that distorts our common perceived reality and misdirects human history to this very day. With a foreword by Prof. Dr. James H. Fetzer; contains a bibliography and an index.

30 review for Breaking the Spell: The Holocaust, Myth & Reality

  1. 4 out of 5

    Ryan

    This is the 2nd book I've read about Holocaust revisionist history, and it's just as good as the first, although slightly less methodical than Thomas Dalton's work. Kollerstrom's book introduces additional evidence not in Dalton's book. Reading both provides indisputable evidence that the Holocaust is a hoax. Now, having read two books on the subject, it is evident that the Holocaust is perhaps the greatest lie perpetrated on mankind in the last hundred years, perhaps ever. On the one hand, revisi This is the 2nd book I've read about Holocaust revisionist history, and it's just as good as the first, although slightly less methodical than Thomas Dalton's work. Kollerstrom's book introduces additional evidence not in Dalton's book. Reading both provides indisputable evidence that the Holocaust is a hoax. Now, having read two books on the subject, it is evident that the Holocaust is perhaps the greatest lie perpetrated on mankind in the last hundred years, perhaps ever. On the one hand, revisionists use evidence to prove their case. On the other, those who advocate an exterminist view have little at their disposal other than ad hominem attacks and gory fairy tales. Furthermore, if the truth can stand on its own, then why have so many European governments passed thought crime laws to punish those who question the official Holocaust story? Since when is an investigation of historical facts a crime? Anyway, I'm glad I've read both Dalton's and Kollerstrom's books and look forward to reading more on this subject.

  2. 4 out of 5

    Michiel Gielen

    A horrible and dangerous book. Kollerstrom cherrypicks himself through the history of the Holocaust, ignores evidence, presents dubious evidence and investigations from other deniers and tells outright lies. No archeological evidence in Treblinka? Google archeological evidence in Treblinka. Zyklon B only used as pesticide? Read Rudolf Hoess and the reports of the German perpetrators, well documented. Literally tons of documents, trials and confessions, it is truly amazing. The extermination of the A horrible and dangerous book. Kollerstrom cherrypicks himself through the history of the Holocaust, ignores evidence, presents dubious evidence and investigations from other deniers and tells outright lies. No archeological evidence in Treblinka? Google archeological evidence in Treblinka. Zyklon B only used as pesticide? Read Rudolf Hoess and the reports of the German perpetrators, well documented. Literally tons of documents, trials and confessions, it is truly amazing. The extermination of the Jews was mostly done by bullets (read Holocaust by Bullets by P. Desbois and the tons of -physical- evidence). Something in Babi-Yar but I forgot. Masters of Death by Rhodes and of course the "Einzatsgruppen Trials", all conveniently forgotten in this vile book. I am happy for the white supremacists who want their Aryan bias confirmed. Read "Denying the Holocaust by Michael Schermer" for a concise, patient and intelligent rebuttal of all deniers. If you don't like Israel and/or the political exploitatation of the Holocaust, read Norman Finkelstein's "The Holocaust Industry". If you are a nazi and hate jews, stick a rusty nail in your brain. Your Führer is dead, get over it.

  3. 5 out of 5

    Claire Paravel

    This book has the audacity to challenge the one great truth of all time , a truth that we have put laws in place to protect it from any kind of criticism and skepticism whatsoever. This book is dangerous as it hints at a different truth. That is why we decided to shred then burn all the existing copies we had for sale then ban it and 171 other books just like it on amazon, while keeping the story out of the main stream media. How dare anyone question the 6 million number we have hammered it into This book has the audacity to challenge the one great truth of all time , a truth that we have put laws in place to protect it from any kind of criticism and skepticism whatsoever. This book is dangerous as it hints at a different truth. That is why we decided to shred then burn all the existing copies we had for sale then ban it and 171 other books just like it on amazon, while keeping the story out of the main stream media. How dare anyone question the 6 million number we have hammered it into the subconscious of everyone on the planet. This is not a subject for discussion or debate the truth is what we say it is. Anyone who claims different is an anti-Semite and should be shot in the face with a bazooka.

  4. 4 out of 5

    Kevin Boyle

    Excellent, brilliant book that everybody should be made to read. How the world would change if that were to happen. Dr. Kollerstrom has suffered for his love of truth but he should be commended for his losses were not in vain. Dr. Kollersrom has hit the bullseye with every arrow launched at this forbidding target. Well done, congratulations and thank you to our own (UK) 'holocaust' revisionist. The suicidal nightmare must end. The spell will be broken. Excellent, brilliant book that everybody should be made to read. How the world would change if that were to happen. Dr. Kollerstrom has suffered for his love of truth but he should be commended for his losses were not in vain. Dr. Kollersrom has hit the bullseye with every arrow launched at this forbidding target. Well done, congratulations and thank you to our own (UK) 'holocaust' revisionist. The suicidal nightmare must end. The spell will be broken.

  5. 4 out of 5

    Steven Atkinson

    A brilliant and thorough explanation of the Holohoax, with plenty reference to evidence taken from official documents and eye witness testimonies that are not only ignored by the mainstream but which it is now illegal in many countries to even mention. 3 million jews in Hitler's circle of influence before the war, 6 million exterminated in death camps and sadly only 5.8 survive! Yes this is the official story, you do the math it's as ridiculous as the official 9/11 story. A brilliant and thorough explanation of the Holohoax, with plenty reference to evidence taken from official documents and eye witness testimonies that are not only ignored by the mainstream but which it is now illegal in many countries to even mention. 3 million jews in Hitler's circle of influence before the war, 6 million exterminated in death camps and sadly only 5.8 survive! Yes this is the official story, you do the math it's as ridiculous as the official 9/11 story.

  6. 5 out of 5

    N

    Interviews with Dr. Kollerstrom regarding this book: Dr. Nicholas Kollerstrom, Ph.D. - Red Ice Radio - March 3 2015 http://www.redicecreations.com/radio/... Dr. Nicholas Kollerstrom, Ph.D. - Spingola Spreaks Radio - April 25 2915 http://spingolaspeaks.net/2015/04/25/... Video review: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3yoOL... REVIEWS Ezra MacVie: http://inconvenienthistory.com/archiv... Prof. em. Dr. J.H. Fetzer: http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/11/... CODOH discussions of the book: https://forum.codoh.com Interviews with Dr. Kollerstrom regarding this book: Dr. Nicholas Kollerstrom, Ph.D. - Red Ice Radio - March 3 2015 http://www.redicecreations.com/radio/... Dr. Nicholas Kollerstrom, Ph.D. - Spingola Spreaks Radio - April 25 2915 http://spingolaspeaks.net/2015/04/25/... Video review: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3yoOL... REVIEWS Ezra MacVie: http://inconvenienthistory.com/archiv... Prof. em. Dr. J.H. Fetzer: http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/11/... CODOH discussions of the book: https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php... https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php... Interesting information on this book: https://shop.codoh.com/book/365/366 Flyer: https://shop.codoh.com/media/uploads/br ... lflyer.pdf Video review: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3yoOL... Watch the author's YouTube presentation on occasion of the launch of this book in London: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CRAUH... Listen to a presentation by Prof. em. Dr. J.H. Fetzer on this book; scroll forward to 1:02:00 = http://nwopodcast.com/fetz/media/jim%... Other information on the book: https://shop.codoh.com/book/365/366 Other interviews on WW2: Dr. Nicholas Kollerstrom, Ph.D. – Kevin Barret - truthjihadradio - January 29, 2013 http://noliesradio.org/archives/56587 Dr. Nicholas Kollerstrom, Ph.D. - Kevin Barret - truthjihadradio - March 2013 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qh3eq... Dr. Nicholas Kollerstrom, Ph.D. - Spingola Speaks - August 6 2013 http://spingolaspeaks.net/2013-guests/ Dr. Nicholas Kollerstrom, Ph.D. - Kevin Barret - truthjihadradio - April 12 2014 http://noliesradio.org/archives/80828 Dr. Nicholas Kollerstrom, Ph.D. - Kevin Barret - truthjihadradio - December 24 2014 http://noliesradio.org/archives/93234

  7. 4 out of 5

    Paul Eisen

    An excellent book combining dedicated scholarship with a moving story of dissidence under fire. A must-read for anyone who values truthfulness and courage

  8. 4 out of 5

    Mark

    A literary feat in the art of bullshitting. Want to know more about his fascist sources? Read 'Denying the Holocaust' by Deborah Lipstadt Want to know more about homicidal gas chambers? Read 'The Case for Auschwitz' by Robert Jan van Pelt Want to know more about his dodgy claims about the "disputed" 6 million? Read 'Denying History' by Shermer and Grobman Kollerstrom is a serial delusionalist who makes his living off trying to shove a square peg into a circle hole in an attempt to implicate the Jews A literary feat in the art of bullshitting. Want to know more about his fascist sources? Read 'Denying the Holocaust' by Deborah Lipstadt Want to know more about homicidal gas chambers? Read 'The Case for Auschwitz' by Robert Jan van Pelt Want to know more about his dodgy claims about the "disputed" 6 million? Read 'Denying History' by Shermer and Grobman Kollerstrom is a serial delusionalist who makes his living off trying to shove a square peg into a circle hole in an attempt to implicate the Jews in various nefarious schemes for world domination. He is worse than a moron, he is a moron who is wilfully spreading antisemitism. I could forgive him for being simply a crank, but he's all that and a bigot.

  9. 4 out of 5

    Peter Holman

    A great book and like all of Kollerstroms books he clearly articulates his research which prove what is told in the mainstream and what we've been told previously is complete nonsense. Kollerstrom is a brave man to tackle a topic of this nature and that's what makes his work so special. He takes on what stories we have been told and obliterates that line of thought with clear evidence that shows the Holocaust was not what we thought it was. After reading his book I can't believe I just accepted A great book and like all of Kollerstroms books he clearly articulates his research which prove what is told in the mainstream and what we've been told previously is complete nonsense. Kollerstrom is a brave man to tackle a topic of this nature and that's what makes his work so special. He takes on what stories we have been told and obliterates that line of thought with clear evidence that shows the Holocaust was not what we thought it was. After reading his book I can't believe I just accepted what I was previously taught. Kollerstrom provides so much proof for everyone to challenge our preconceived knowledge on this topic. Some of the stories we are told are ludicrous based on the actual scientific evidence provided. A must read for everyone who can actually read so the truth can be told. The truth fears no investigation and that's exactly why this book is not available on mainstream sites! There should be more people like Nick Kollerstrom on this planet.

  10. 5 out of 5

    Charles

    This book is a good start to anyone who doesn't' know anything about the revisionist work and that wants to study more on other aspects of the official history established by the vanquishers of WWII. a kind of "history" which could be considered as mere prolongation of the war propaganda fabricated by the Allies. To those who want to study deeper on the technical aspects of the so called "final solution", I recommend to read the books of Germar Rudolf and Carlo Mattogno. To those who still believ This book is a good start to anyone who doesn't' know anything about the revisionist work and that wants to study more on other aspects of the official history established by the vanquishers of WWII. a kind of "history" which could be considered as mere prolongation of the war propaganda fabricated by the Allies. To those who want to study deeper on the technical aspects of the so called "final solution", I recommend to read the books of Germar Rudolf and Carlo Mattogno. To those who still believe in the propaganda against revisionism spread by the so called "historian" Deborah Lipstadt, have a look on the videos shown on the Rudolf's web site "Lipstadt’s Lies & Deceptions, Part One & Two" http://germarrudolf.com/en/welcome-to...

  11. 5 out of 5

    Marius Hofstad

    This is my review of Nick Kollerstroms ideas from his book, it will be a reply in 2 parts: But as a beginning i should state the following, The arguments that Kollerstrom gives have no relevance outside the holocaust deniers movement or other people that are less knowledgeable on the topic that is holocaust. Kollerstroms argument is far from his own.The things he says have been said for years by other deniers and have been falsified for a long time ago. The only reason these argument still circu This is my review of Nick Kollerstroms ideas from his book, it will be a reply in 2 parts: But as a beginning i should state the following, The arguments that Kollerstrom gives have no relevance outside the holocaust deniers movement or other people that are less knowledgeable on the topic that is holocaust. Kollerstroms argument is far from his own.The things he says have been said for years by other deniers and have been falsified for a long time ago. The only reason these argument still circulates in different publications and websites is because holocaust deniers do not read the more official research that are contributed by knowl scholars all over the world. Holocaust denial is a typical example of opinions that are shaped in so called echo-chambers. As a beginning, one should start with the man himself, Nick Kollerstrom. If you google him on the web he does not seem to have left many traces of an extensive academic career here. His curriculum vitae seem not to be so long, but he have received a PhD on Newton’s theories on the moon, so I will not deny that he must have some extensive knowledge about scholarly method. The paradox is still that he seems to have very little knowledge about the topic, which he are talking about. However, in the realm of conspiracies he has left far more traces. Kollerstrom seem to be a believer of pretty much every conspiracy that is out there, like the 9/11-conspiracy, the 7/7-london bombing-conspiracy, the Falkland War-conspiracy, or his book on how Paul McCartney really died in the sixties and where replaced by lookalike. These things alone does not make him very believable. In the interview, he claim to have been sacked from his job at Cambridge. But this was only an honorary research fellow, was an unpaid position. If we move to the interview he starts, as most deniers do, with the obligatory whining and moaning of how he is a fighter against “the spell” and is victim of a witch-hunt. This is the typical populist way of argumentation and something that is not very scholarly conduct. 1. Early in the interview he claims that the enigma project and British intelligence decrypt did not reveal any signs of killing of jews or that historians have not been interested in this at all. Here he is wrong on both parts. I could mention Nigel de Grey, the code breaker that gave the most horrifying reports to Churchill: Many of the messages that he decrypted names murder on Jews explicitly. Like the Jeckeln’s message of 23. Aug announcing that his men in the Luginy area shot and killed 367 Jews. Another report from 24. Aug names the killing of 603 Jews. Yet a second report from Jeckeln to Berlin gives number of 1625 Jews killed in Kiev. The 1st SS Brigade had taken 85 POW; they had also captured 283 Jews that was shot. The reports also mention killing of Russian POW. Contrary to what he says there has been written many books on this subject: - Bauer, F. L. (2000). Decrypted Secrets (2nd ed.). Springer. ISBN 3-540-66871-3. - Hamer, David H.; Sullivan, Geoff; Weierud, Frode (July 1998). "Enigma Variations: An Extended Family of Machines" (PDF). Cryptologia. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis. XXII (3). ISSN 0161-1194. Retrieved 18 February 2016. - Stripp, Alan (1993). Hinsley, F. H.; Stripp, Alan, eds. The Enigma Machine: Its Mechanism and Use. Codebreakers: The Inside Story of Bletchley Park. - Kahn, David (1991). Seizing the Enigma: The Race to Break the German U-Boats Codes, 1939–1943. ISBN 0-395-42739-8. - Kozaczuk, Władysław (1984). Kasparek, Christopher, ed. Enigma: How the German Machine Cipher Was Broken, and How It Was Read by the Allies in World War Two. Frederick, MD: University Publications of America. ISBN 0-89093-547-5. - Kozaczuk, Władysław. "The origins of the Enigma/ULTRA". - Kruh, L.; Deavours, C. (2002). "The Commercial Enigma: Beginnings of Machine Cryptography". Cryptologia. 26: 1–16. doi:10.1080/0161-110291890731. - Marks, Philip; Weierud, Frode (2000). "Recovering the Wiring of Enigma's Umkehrwalze A". Cryptologia. 24 (1): 55–66. doi:10.1080/0161-110091888781. - Rejewski, Marian (1980). "An Application of the Theory of Permutations in Breaking the Enigma Cipher". Applicationes mathematicae. 16 (4). ISSN 1730-6280. - Smith, Michael (2000). Station X: The Code breakers of Bletchley Park. Pan. ISBN 0-7522-7148-2. - Smith, Michael (2006). "How it began: Bletchley Park Goes to War". In Copeland, B Jack. Colossus: The Secrets of Bletchley Park's Code breaking Computers. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-284055-4. - Ulbricht, Heinz (2005). "Die Chiffriermaschine Enigma — Trügerische Sicherheit: Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der Nachrichtendienste" [The Enigma Cipher Machine — Deceptive Security: A contribution to the history of intelligence services] (PDF). PhD Thesis (in German). It is true that these sources for the holocaust and the WWII has not been a bigger part of the holocaust historiography before fairly recent, but this material has been restricted for historical resource since the material, like most intelligence-documents has not been available before now. 2. “Zyklon B was only used for disinfection” It is true that Zyklon B was used for killing vermin’s and such, but it is evident that its use was extended to also killing humans during the killing process in Birkenau and Majdanek. The documents concerning gas chambers have used coded language to not give evidence of what had been done in the buildings for this purpose (gas chambers). Normally the gas chambers was always referred to as morgue (leichenkeller). But in a document dated 29 January 1943 , from the Auschwitz archives , a Nazi official moved away from this practice. In the same document he called the crematorium 2 both Morgue and Vergasungkeller ( gas chamber ). There are also documents from February 1943 referring to the provision of gastight doors and windows. In a letter dated 31 March 1943 Bischoff presses for the delivery of a gastight door with a spyhole of 8mm glass, with a rubber seal and metal fitting. There is a timesheet of a construction worker which makes reference to fitting gastight windows to crematorium 4. Van Pelt pointed to a letter dated 6 March 1943 from Auschwitz to the Topf Company which contemplated the use of hot air from the ventilators for the incinerators to pre-heat the Leichenkeller 1. If the gas chambers real use was morgues, like most deniers claim, then why did they need the abilities to warm up the chambers? There are many more documents that gives sources for the killing process in different camps, like when the germans themselves put the many camps under investigation for corruption. The leader of the investigation Konrad Morgen made a lot of racket after his findings of “unlawful killings in the camps”. He found out later that the policies for killing of Jews and prisoners was in many cases signed by the Gestapo Chief Müller. (Ref: Konrad Morgen: The Conscience of a Nazi Judge 2015th Edition by H. Pauer-Studer, J. Velleman (Authors). 3. He goes into a short ramble on how “the jews are after him”, before he goes on to claim that there is no historical gas chambers to visit today. Here, once again, he is wrong. The best example of a gas chamber that was fully operating during the war and that still stands today, is the one on Majdanek. http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/j... The ruins of the chambers in Birkenau has been subject of many resource projects and their findings are the last nail in the coffin for any doubt of the chambers purpose. The Keren, McCarthy and Mazal report clearly shows, through their examination of the ruins. http://hgs.oxfordjournals.org/content... He then goes on with another distraction where he says that “it’s all about guilt”. This is of the more meaningless off-spring of the denier historiography. For most countries that experienced the war, in particular the eastern parts of Europe, the topic of holocaust have not been highlighted topic of the Second World War, before. At least this is true if we narrow it down to historical resource. For the western world, it happened a shift after the Eichmann trial in 1961-62. The tv-series Holocaust in 1978 was also a great renewal of the holocaust in many people’s knowledge. 4. His next point is the color of the bodies, that should have another color than that what witness testimonies have told after the war. This argument is of course not of his own research. The color of Zyklon B victims originates from denier Friedrich Berg. The thing that created Bergs argument is Fig. 10.9.2 in section 10.9 "Deaths on Board" of the Textbook of Marine Medicine, written by Claas Buschmann, which can be read under https://web.archive.org/web/2012 .... It shows a fatal victim of carbon monoxide poisoning in the state of livor mortis, a condition that occurs after death as "the blood sinks down into the dependent parts of the body – the formerly circulating blood volume is pulled downward by gravity". Livor mortis, as Buschmann explains and shows on hand of photographs, is "usually bluish-violet due to the deoxygenated blood", but "bright red in cases of carbon monoxide or hydrocyanide poisoning". Both forms of discoloration are quite conspicuous, as you will see when running a Google search on images of livor mortis (livor mortis - Pesquisa Google). So Berg might as well argue that witnesses describing corpses of people who had died from causes other than carbon monoxide or hydrocyanide poisoning (e.g. concentration camp inmates who had died from "natural" causes) were lying because they failed to mention a bluish-violet discoloration of the corpses. Such argument would be just as silly as the argument he is making. As concerns victims of homicidal gassing, it should further be taken into account that, according to Buschmann, livor mortis "appears as patches in the head and neck region 30 minutes after death; it becomes confluent after 1 – 4 hours and reaches its maximum after 3 – 16 hours". This means that 3 to 16 hours are likely to pass before a victim of fatal carbon monoxide or hydrocyanide poisoning, when turned so as to make visible its dependent parts, will look like what one sees in Fig. 10.9.2. By that time, given the pace of body disposal at the extermination camps Belzec, Sobibor and Treblinka according to eyewitness testimonies, the victims would already be in the burial pits or on the cremation rosters, so there’s no reason why any witness involved in taking the bodies to these places should have noticed a particular discoloration of the bodies, even if a) such witness was not too concerned with other aspects of the gruesome process to pay special attention to the corpses’ discoloration, b) the victims had actually died of carbon monoxide poisoning (from the carbon monoxide in the gasoline motor exhaust fumes used for gassing at these places) rather than of suffocation due to oxygen deprivation (as the exhaust fumes displaced the little oxygen they had at their disposal after being packed like sardines into a gas chamber), and c) the victims, despite their weakened and probably anemic state due to the malnutrition that was prevalent in the Polish ghettos where most of the victims came from, actually developed bright red livor mortis after death. The "ifs" b) and c) are big "ifs", for the reasons explained in blog the blog Belzec, Sobibor, Treblinka. Holocaust Denial and Operation Reinhard. Chapter 5: Gas Chambers at the Aktion Reinhard Camps (6). Corpse Color 5. One of the oldest arguments from holocaust deniers is that the only motives behind the holocaust narrative is to claim money from Germany for Israel. There are many things wrong here. Israel was not the only country that demanded and got reparation money after the war. Other countries that was occupied, like Poland, Greece, Netherlands and Roma/Sinti people also got money from Germany after the war. Israel was payed in general for receiving more Jewish refugees than any other country, around 500 – 600 000. The particulars of this was stated first in the Morgenthau agreement and finally in the London Agreement on German External Debts, known as the London Debt Agreement (German: Londoner Schuldenabkommen) of 1953. The particularities of the reparation money from Germany to Israel was established during the Claim conference between western Allies and Israel in 1951. German Chancellor Konrad Adenauer was actually the one to give the reasoning for why Germany should have this debt to Israel: "… unspeakable crimes have been committed in the name of the German people, calling for moral and material indemnity … The Federal Government are prepared, jointly with representatives of Jewry and the State of Israel … to bring about a solution of the material indemnity problem, thus easing the way to the spiritual settlement of infinite suffering." The Zionists groups in Israel was in fact one of the strongest opponents against taking the money from Germany. However, the situation after the Israel-arabic wars had put Israel in a serious financial crisis, that made it impossible not to take the money. (ref: Sagi, Nana. 1986. German Reparations: A History of the Negotiations. Palgrave Macmillan) 6. “A crime to question the holocaust” It is true that some countries like Germany, Austria and Israel have though laws against holocaust denial, which again can refer to the different countries part of the holocaust legacy. There are around 13-15 other countries that also deniers add to this list of countries that supposedly have laws against any question on the holocaust narrative. This is also a great construction from the revisionist school. The countries in question is either not particularly large, like Lithuania, Luxembourg or Lichtenstein. Another thing about these kinds of laws is that they in most cases are not directed at holocaust denial in particular. Most of the laws targets denial of any genocide or hate speech, or denial performed in combination with hate speech.

  12. 5 out of 5

    Varapanyo Bhikkhu

    Thousands of people, or more likely tens of thousands, are in jail right across Europe for the crime of trying to find the truth of what happened sixty years ago, and what calls itself a UK “Truth” movement cannot discuss the topic. ↓ Kollerstrom: After somewhat over a decade of quiet academic research, my life changed rather abruptly as I became ethically damned, thrown out of polite, decent groups, banned from forums and denounced in newspapers, with half my friends not speaking to me any more – Thousands of people, or more likely tens of thousands, are in jail right across Europe for the crime of trying to find the truth of what happened sixty years ago, and what calls itself a UK “Truth” movement cannot discuss the topic. ↓ Kollerstrom: After somewhat over a decade of quiet academic research, my life changed rather abruptly as I became ethically damned, thrown out of polite, decent groups, banned from forums and denounced in newspapers, with half my friends not speaking to me any more – while the other half still would, provided I kept off “that awful subject.” So as a philosopher I was granted an unusual and excellent opportunity to ponder the difference between what is real and what is illusory. * The fastest way to get expelled from a British university is by saying you are looking at chemical evidence for how Zyklon was used in World War II, with a discussion of how delousing technology functioned in the German World War II labour camps. This is considered to be absolutely forbidden. How strange is that? After being a member of my college for 15 years I was thrown out with one day’s warning, having been given no op-portunity to defend myself, a fact announced on its website. What I had done was so terrible that it could not announce what my crime was: I felt like Faust caught making his pact with the devil. The British media had carte blanche for their character-assassination. Fortunately, a few friends could still bring themselves to talk to me. * As a founder-member of the dynamic 9/11 “truth” movement in London, I liked the people there and their angle on world affairs. I don’t know much about politics: I don’t read the papers or watch television, and I try to forget the names of politicians. I would learn at that group about current events, and hear experts – for that is what they were – debating the apocalyptic and ever-mysterious 9/11 event. Then in 2010 the group broke up, and I found myself being blamed for this and banned from their web-forum. This damnation wasn’t because of anything I had said during the meetings, but because of something which they had discovered that I believed relating to events of seventy years ago in Eastern Europe. This turned out to be vastly more important than any mere discussion about 9/11, because it was totally fundamental. Well, if it was so important, could we not discuss the subject? No, it turned out that we couldn’t: the group did not wish to discuss so terrible a topic! After I was expelled, the group disintegrated, for there was nothing further it could do. The pressure of not being allowed to debate the subject, which was so awful that I had to be expelled, kind of made it impossible to meet any more. That’s why the two UK 9/11 truth websites both have disclaimers – in case you’re interested – asserting that no Holo-debate is permitted. Thousands of people, or more likely tens of thousands, are in jail right across Europe for the crime of trying to find the truth of what happened sixty years ago, and what calls itself a UK “Truth” movement cannot discuss the topic.* You’re reading a treatise about something in history which never existed, a process in history which never took place. The understanding of this will involve a Copernican revolution. I seem to be in the position of taking away from people their worst nightmare, which has been the very foundation of their Unbelief and denial of Divine Providence, and has given us the comic-book concept of Pure Evil which endlessly enables our civiliza-tion to hate the collective Other, the Other-who-is-to-be-bombed. That concept of Pure Evil has ruined our post-war culture. While being hammered with the Three Synonyms “Nazi! Anti-Semite! Holocaust-Denier!” I had cause to reflect upon what Jesus meant with his words about the Beam and Mote: we are required to perceive the view of the Other, who is being demonized. Europe needs that honest debate, where people are allowed to express their views and conclusions about What Really Happened without continually having false motives attributed to them. Europe has no worthwhile future unless it is prepared to have that debate. In my opinion, Revisionists are now going to win any such debates, which is why they cannot be allowed to take place. *According to Gordon Duff writing on Veterans Today in 2010: “Two thousand people in Europe are in prison today for questioning some part, no matter how minor, of the holocaust.” (“Who speaks up for Holocaust Survivors?”) That has to be quite an underestimate. Around fifteen thousand German citizens are tried each year for the Thought Crime, so-called “right-wing extremism.” The prosecution of dissidents, patriots and nationalists in Germany has grown increasingly severe in recent years. “Aside from widely publicised high-profile cases, it is impossible to definitively state the specific number of victims who have fallen under the punitive arm of Holocaust denial legislation since these laws were first enacted. It has been estimated that over 58,000 individuals in Germany alone have been prosecuted for various thought-crimes during the period 1994-1999. During the course of one year, 1999, Germany’s aggressive policy of enforcing these repressive laws accounted for 11,248 convictions.” J. Bellinger, Smith’s Report, “The Prohibition of Holocaust Denial,” Sept 2009. Germany has also become the only country in the Western world where defending oneself in court can be unwise, because it risks committing the very offence for which one is charged! Ask Sylvia Stolz (Santiago Alvarez, “Germany Proud of Persecuting Dissidents,” The Barnes Review newsletter, 5 August 2012; www.barnesreview.org/wp/archives/577)

  13. 5 out of 5

    Angela

    Very enlightening

  14. 5 out of 5

    Erin Pierce

    Interesting and compelling read that challenges the accepted narrative of the holocaust. Somewhat dry reading with the facts and figures, hence the 3 star rating.

  15. 4 out of 5

    Luke

  16. 4 out of 5

    Rubeyn Mmarison

  17. 4 out of 5

    Stu Pot

  18. 5 out of 5

    Macrobius

  19. 4 out of 5

    Thomas Doherty

  20. 4 out of 5

    kurt kern

  21. 5 out of 5

    Don Hermiston

  22. 4 out of 5

    V

  23. 4 out of 5

    Luiz Henrique

  24. 5 out of 5

    colin logan

  25. 5 out of 5

    Fredrik

  26. 4 out of 5

    Gordon Zola

  27. 4 out of 5

    Lisa

  28. 5 out of 5

    karsten hald nielsen

  29. 4 out of 5

    Odd Bod

  30. 5 out of 5

    Fred

Add a review

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Loading...
We use cookies to give you the best online experience. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy.